World

Motion made to dismiss defamation lawsuit against Jason Kenney

A lawyer for former Alberta premier Jason Kenney was in court Friday, arguing a defamation lawsuit against him should be dismissed.

Kenney and the Alberta government are named in the lawsuit filed by several environmental groups: Environmental Defence, West Coast Environmental Law, Stand.earth, Dogwood and the Wilderness Committee.

Read more:

‘A witch hunt’: Critics question intentions of Kenney’s anti-oil sands inquiry

Read next:

‘We kind of missed the landing’: Alberta premier on awkward handshake with prime minister

The lawsuit stems from the findings of the public inquiry into anti-Alberta energy campaigns and comments made by Kenney.

The groups claim statements made by Kenney and the provincial government “directly contradicted the findings of the final report of the Public Inquiry into Anti-Alberta Energy Campaigns” and that both parties “refused to retract statements and issue an apology.”

Story continues below advertisement

Read more:

Alberta public inquiry finds no wrongdoing in anti-oilsands campaign

Read next:

Liberal MP tops all others with $21.9K spending on ‘protocol gifts.’ Here’s what he spent it on

The groups claim that statements made in the province’s “key findings” document — which were repeated by Kenney — are defamatory because they “assert environmental groups have deliberately spread ‘misinformation’ about the Alberta oil and gas industry” despite the fact that the inquiry’s commissioner, Steve Allan, made no such finding.

Allan’s Alberta inquiry report found no organized campaign of misinformation.

Read more:

Alberta premier files defence in defamation lawsuit about oil inquiry comments

Read next:

More Canadians trusting governments as COVID pandemic fades: poll

Those statements appeared on a government website as well as Kenney’s Facebook page and Twitter feed.

Kenney’s defence says there is no defamation because his remarks don’t identify any of the groups that brought the lawsuit.

“The web page, the Facebook post, and the tweet do not and cannot reasonably be understood to refer to the plaintiffs, as alleged or at all,” says the statement of defence, filed March 2022, in Edmonton Court of Queen’s Bench.

“The Key Findings document does not allege that any of these organizations disseminated misinformation, or otherwise indicate that they participated in the decade-long campaign of misinformation mentioned above… The Facebook post and the tweet do not mention any of the plaintiffs, nor do they link to the web page.”

Story continues below advertisement


Click to play video: 'Robbie Picard, founder of Oilsands Strong, on Jason Kenney'


Robbie Picard, founder of Oilsands Strong, on Jason Kenney


As a result of Kenney and the government’s statements, the groups say they, as well as individuals, were targeted on social media and some even received death threats.

The groups are seeking $15,000 each in actual damages and an additional $500,000 in punitive damages against Kenney.

Read more:

Kenney government launches inquiry into foreign-funded groups that criticize Alberta’s oil industry

Read next:

House of Commons marks moment of silence for deadly Laval daycare bus crash

Kenney’s lawyer argued Friday the case should be dismissed because in three out of four documents, the plaintiffs are not directly named. The judge has reserved her decision.


Click to play video: 'Alberta government releases results of Steve Allan’s anti-oilsands campaign inquiry'


Alberta government releases results of Steve Allan’s anti-oilsands campaign inquiry


  • With files from The Canadian Press

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Disclaimer: No copyright infringement intended. All rights and credits reserved to respective owner(s).

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Categories